Skip to content
IND-06 · NGOs and development organisations

EDMS for NGOs, where a donor audit is won or lost on whether the document is there

Development organisations operate across country offices, partners and field sites, and are judged on documentary evidence they may need to produce years after a programme closes. EDMS by Sibasi holds grant, procurement and programme documentation in one repository that works over field bandwidth and stands up in a donor audit.

Book a demo See pricing

REF / RECORDS

What you hold

The file plan is built around these. Each record class gets its own metadata, permissions and retention position.

  • Grant agreements, amendments and donor correspondence
  • Programme proposals, workplans and reports
  • Procurement files and supplier documentation
  • Partner agreements and due diligence records
  • Field monitoring reports and beneficiary documentation
  • Financial vouchers and supporting evidence
  • Board, governance and statutory filings
  • Safeguarding and incident records

REF / OBLIGATIONS

What you are judged against

These are the rules the deployment is configured to satisfy — mapped onto retention schedules, access models and audit reporting during design, not asserted afterwards.

Compliance

Donor grant conditions

Institutional donors specify record retention periods, procurement documentation standards and the right to audit for years after closure.

Compliance

Data protection and safeguarding

Beneficiary data and safeguarding records demand restricted access and demonstrable handling controls.

Compliance

Statutory registration and reporting

NGO regulators require annual returns and supporting documentation to be maintained and produced on request.

Compliance

External and donor audit

Audit sampling reaches back across closed projects. Missing evidence becomes a disallowed cost.

Compliance is a property of your organisation rather than of software. What the platform provides is the technical control and the evidence — see security and compliance for how each control is implemented.

REF / BEFORE

What tends to be true today

  • Evidence lives with whoever created it

    Procurement documentation on a country office drive, monitoring reports on a field laptop, approvals in email.

  • Closed projects, dispersed teams

    An audit reaches back four years to a programme whose staff have long since moved on.

  • Bandwidth that cannot carry the system

    Field offices on constrained connections, where a portal that assumes fibre simply is not used.

  • Multiple donors, multiple filing conventions

    Each funder wants evidence organised its own way, and staff maintain parallel folder structures by hand.

REF / AFTER

What the deployment changes

  • One evidence base across country offices

    Documentation captured centrally with country and programme metadata, so a request can be answered from anywhere.

  • Retention tied to grant closure

    Retention clocks start on project close and run for the donor-specified period, applied automatically per grant.

  • Usable on a field connection

    Mobile capture, offline sync and low-bandwidth loading, so records are filed where they are created.

  • Audit packs assembled from the system

    Evidence indexed against grant, budget line and procurement reference, exported as a set instead of hunted for.

REF / RELATED

Other sectors

IND-01

Public sector

EDMS for registries that still run on a file movement book
IND-02

Financial services

EDMS for banks and SACCOs: files that are complete when the regulator asks
IND-03

Healthcare

Controlled clinical documents, and privacy that holds: EDMS for health institutions

REF / NEXT STEP

See EDMS by Sibasi configured for ngos & development

Bring one of your own record types and one process that currently takes too long. We will show you both running in under an hour.

Book a demo Request a proposal